![]() Of course, your immediate solution maybe to bounce down tracks on the Juno and bring them over individually - that works too. The purpose of the DAW is to do all these things. ![]() Since you asked about an optimum setup, I would recommend investing in an Audio Interface for your computer if you are going to be multi-tracking with the intention of producing audio files.Īs Artemiy explained, you can still use Reaper to sequence the MIDI and record audio at the same time. Have I got hold of the wrong end of the stick? If I'm to get the Juno sounds, will I always have to go back there for the last stage? Or can I get the Juno track audio directed to my DAW for final rendering? Thanks in advance for any advice. It seems as though I always have to get the rendered version at Juno level, which rather defeats the purpose of the DAW. ![]() My problem now is that I can't render a finished WAV or mp3 to the PC directly from Reaper (to send to the other band members). All the MIDI data (7 tracks in this instance) appear on Reaper and I can make/save changes, with the Juno acting as playback sequencer. I've MIDI-hooked the Juno I/O to Reaper on a PC. ![]() Although the Juno features are amazing, I find Juno track editing and mixdown slow and distracting- not helpful for the creative process. Could anyone help me get a vision of the most efficient configuration of Juno-G and a DAW? My primary aim is the exchange of partially complete songs with other band members as mp3/WAV. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |